11 Temmuz 2012 Çarşamba
10 Temmuz 2012 Salı
9 Temmuz 2012 Pazartesi
FDA: Software Failures Responsible for 24% Of All Medical Device Recalls
Software failures were behind 24 percent of all the medical device recalls in 2011, according to data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which said it is gearing up its labs to spend more time analyzing the quality and security of software-based medical instruments and equipment.
The FDA's Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL) released the data in its 2011 Annual Report on June 15, amid reports of a compromise of a Web site used to distribute software updates for hospital respirators. The absence of solid architecture and "principled engineering practices" in software development affects a wide range of medical devices, with potentially life-threatening consequences, the Agency said. In response, FDA told Threatpost that it is developing tools to disassemble and test medical device software and locate security problems and weak design.
... "Manufacturers are responsible for identifying risks and hazards associated with medical device software (or) firmware, including risks related to security, and are responsible for putting appropriate mitigations in place to address patient safety," the agency said in an e-mail statement.
Health IT medical devices are the exception, of course. A health IT virtual medical device is always of rock-solid architecture, always uses "principled engineering practices" in software development, and never has life-threatening consequences, of course.
Hence its special regulatory accommodations over non-virtual (tangible) medical devices.
-- SS
"More Marketing Than Science" - An Anonymous Confession About Deceptive Marketing Published in the British Medical Journal
We have previously discussed examples of health care corporate insiders confessing their individual efforts to turn medical research and education into marketing. For example, peruse this. We have also discussed how documents made public through litigation have revealed marketing plans for specific drugs that used apparently academic, educational, or scholarly publications and venues to market without revealing this transformation. For example, see the Neurontin marketing plan (see post here), and the Lexapro marketing plan (see post here). We have also discussed numerous examples of manipulation of particular research studies by those with vested interests, and outright suppression of studies whose results did not favor such vested interests.
Yet I suspect majorities of health care academics and professionals, health care policy makers, and the public at large do not realize, or would not admit that the evidence base for making health care decisions, and the general academic and professional discourse has been so corrupted. So it is worthwhile to review once again how an insider summarized this corruption.
Research Studies Designed Primarily as Marketing Vehicles
In general, the anonymous author suggested that at least some studies were done for marketing, not scientific purposes:
some of the studies I worked on were not designed to determine the overall risk:benefit balance of the drug in the general population. They were designed to support and disseminate a marketing message.
Whether it was to highlight a questionable advantage over a 'me-too' competitor drug or to increase disease awareness among the medical community (particularly in so called invented diseases) and in turn increase product penetration in the market, the truth is that these studies had more marketing than science behind them.
Furthermore, the studies were supervised not by physicians or scientists, but by marketers in the marketing department,
Although the medical department developed the publication plans, designed the study, performed the statistical analysis, and wrote the final paper (which when published was passed on to marketing and sales to be used as marketing material), the marketing team responsible for that product were directly involved in all stages. They also closely supervised the content of other educational 'scientific' materials produced in the medical department and intended for potential prescribers. Instructions from marketing to the medical staff involved were clear: to ensure that the benefits of the drug were emphasised and the disadvantages were minimised where possible.
Manipulation of Research Design, Implementation, or Analysis
The author described how the marketers manipulated research studies so they would produce the results desired from a marketing perspective, regardless of their underlying truth,
Since marketing claims needed to be backed-up scientifically, we occasionally resorted to 'playing' with the data that had originally failed to show the expected result. This was done by altering the statistical method until any statistical significance was found. Such a result might not have supported the marketing claim, but it was always worth giving it a go to see what results you could produce. And it was possible because the protocols of post-marketing studies were lax, and it was not a requirement to specify any statistical methodology in detail. On the other hand, the studies were hypothesis testing (such as cohort studies, case-control studies) rather than hypothesis generating (such as case reports or adverse events reports), so playing with the data felt uncomfortable.
Other practices to ensure the marketing message was clear in the final publication included omission of negative results, usually in secondary outcome measures that had not been specified in the protocol, or inflating the importance of secondary outcome measures if they were positive when the primary measure was not.
So to summarize, the marketers would control the statistical analyses, promoting multiple analyses to attempt to come up with the "right" result that would support the marketing message (although the more kinds of analyses one tries, the more likely one is likely to come up with false results by chance alone). Presumably the marketers did not care whether or not the results were really true, which is perhaps why even they felt "uncomfortable" in some circumstances.
They would also foster the suppression of negative results, and the dredging of data for extra outcome measures when analysis showed no advantage in terms of the real primary outcomes. Suppression of negative results could be viewed as plain lying. Deliberate analysis of multiple end-points again risks identifying random error as true results.
The Role of Key Opinion Leaders
The author described how key opinion leaders, that is, health care professionals thought to be especially influential on practice or policy, were hired to become marketers presumably without revealing this intention.
Every big international observational study had a large advisory board. This was critical since the success of a newly launched drug in the market would depend on how many key opinion leaders were part of the study. Not only would they add credibility to the results, but they would also be key in influencing decision makers and other prescribers. In regional studies with thousands of patients, the study’s advisory board was formed by at least one key opinion leader from each country in that region, ensuring that areas important in terms of possible sales were covered. The contributions of the key opinion leaders to the study were always positive, but in my experience more directed towards designing new studies to answer their specific clinical questions rather than critically appraising our results and conclusions. In general, the relationship was amicable. We took them to the best hotels and restaurants during our advisory board meetings, and they appeared as authors in our research. Later, they would act as the company’s 'ambassadors,' giving conferences, teaching doctors, or talking to the media about the benefits of the drug.
Note that even the anonymous author could not bring him or herself to call the key opinion leaders salespeople, or marketers, but used the ambiguous wterm "ambassadors." Nonetheless, the role of key opinion leaders described would clearly be that of marketers or salespeople. However, it is extremely doubtful that any of these KOLs felt they had to declare that they were paid salespeople when presenting at conferences, teaching doctors, or talking about the media.
I would suggest that their actions would therefore fit Transparency International's definition of ethical corruption, "abuse of entrusted power for private gain." The KOLs are entrusted to be professional, and in many cases, scholarly. Using a professional or scholarly guise to act as a salesperson appears to be abuse of that entrusted power, in my humble opinion. In nearly every case, KOLs are paid, often handsomely, by the companies whose products they are selling. Thus, key opinion leaders acting as described by the anonymous author appear to be ethically corrupt.
Summary
The evidence of unethical marketing practices by commercial health care firms is mounting. Although I am most familiar with evidence from the US, there is mounting evidence that these practices are global, often done by companies that are not US based, and meant to influence practice and policy world-wide.
As the evidence mounts, it becomes increasingly clear that many such marketing practices are corrupt, at least in an ethical sense. Whether they may break laws in particular countries is a question for someone else.
The latest BMJ article is a reminder how skeptical the shrinking group of health care professionals who do not have conflicts of interest, are not biased in favor of particular products, and who put patients' interests first must be about ALL published research, scholarly publications, and apparently educational activities. Advocates of true evidence-based medicine must be extremely careful to try to use the least biased and manipulated parts of the evidence-base.
The mounting evidence suggests that at a minimum, all research reports, scholarly articles, media reports, conferences, and educational programs should provide full, detailed disclosure of all conflicts of interest. Perhaps having to make a declaration like "I am paid 50,000 Euros a year by the marketing department of company X to help market drug Y" before a supposedly educational talk would make some health care professionals think twice about such relationships.
However, even such detailed disclosure may not be sufficient to hamper marketing practices that now appear overtly corrupt. In my humble opinion, it is time to consider a global ban on the funding or influencing of human research by companies and other organizations which stand to gain financially according to the results of the research, or whose products and services are subject of such research. It is also time to consider a global ban on the funding or influencing of health care education by such organizations.
However, so many people are making so much money from the current practices that I doubt such proposals would get much support, or even public notice beyond this humble blog.
The Revolving Door's Bearings Overheat - Two Examples of the Health Care Insiders Who Keep it Spinning
The Peripetatic Architect of Health Care Reform Implementation
Here is the story of Steve Larsen's latest career move, per the Wall Street Journal,
A top official in charge of implementing the federal health-care overhaul said Friday he would step down in mid-July, shortly after the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the fate of the law.
The official, Steve Larsen, heads the office at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that oversees most of the insurance provisions in the 2010 law. Those include setting up exchanges for consumers to shop for plans and obtain subsidies for premiums, establishing rules on how much money insurers must spend on medical benefits, and administering a federal program to provide insurance for consumers with pre-existing conditions.
Mr. Larsen said in an interview that his departure was '100% for personal and family reasons,' and that he hadn't considered the timing of the court decision. He cited his need to pay tuition for his college-bound children,...
The Wall Street Journal coverage made it sound like Mr Larsen was fleeing his post to avoid dealing with how the Supreme Court's decision on the Obama administration's health care reform law might complicate future functions of his office,
Mr. Larsen's departure highlights the challenges the administration will face once the Supreme Court rules. If the court upholds the law, the administration has a 2014 deadline to put it in place, including persuading states to set up the exchanges or establishing them on states' behalf.
If the court strikes down the law's key requirement, that most individuals purchase insurance or pay a fine, federal officials will have to establish whether they can make the remaining insurance elements of the law work, which would face stiff opposition from insurance companies and from Republican lawmakers who have pledged to overturn the law.
If the court voids the law entirely, officials will have to start undoing hundreds of its requirements that are set up to take effect or are, in many cases, already in place.
It only briefly mentioned where Mr Larsen was going, ostensibly in hopes that a better salary would aid in his tuition payments,
[he] said he would be working at a health-services business unit of UnitedHealth Group, an insurer
On the other hand, a report from Bloomberg suggested that UnitedHealth thought he would be well worth his salary,
Larsen will be executive vice president at Optum, a health services and information technology company that is part of UnitedHealth Group Inc., of Minnetonka, Minn., the company confirmed. UnitedHealth Group is the parent company of UnitedHealthcare, the largest health insurer in the United States in terms of policyholders and revenues.It is funny how that experience seemed to be about crafting the regulations under which Optum, or at least its parent corporation would have to operate.
'We are excited to welcome Steve Larsen to Optum,' company spokesman Matthew Stearns told BNA in an email. 'Steve's extensive, broad-based experience in health care will further enhance the support Optum provides to the health system and consumers in a rapidly evolving environment.'
But wait, there is more. Bloomberg also mentioned that Mr Larsen had previously gone from a state government health policy position to the insurance industry before he wound up at the CCIIO.
Prior to joining the Obama administration to implement PPACA, Larsen served in a number of capacities at Amerigroup Corp., a public managed care company serving Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries, according to his biography on the CCIIO website. Larsen also was Maryland insurance commissioner for six years, chairman of the Maryland Public Service Commission for Gov. Martin O'Malley (D),...To clarify, Amerigroup is a publicly-held, Fortune 500 for-profit corporation (look here).
So in summary, and in chronological order, as best as I can establish it, Mr Larsen went from a Maryland state government policy position that affected health (and other insurance) companies, to a health insurance company (Amerigroup), to a US government policy position that affected health insurance, and now to another health insurance company (UnitedHealth).
The Peripatetic Legislative Policy Director
Brett Roper moved in the opposite direction, to government from industry, and to the Republican legislative majority, not the executive branch now controlled by the Democrats. Early in June, on the Republic Report,
In late 2010, as Congressman John Boehner (R-OH) prepared to take the gavel as Speaker, he hired a lobbyist named Brett Loper as his new policy chief. Loper left his job at the Advanced Medical Technology Association, a lobby group for medical device-makers, to join Boehner.
The Association did not seem to sad to see him go,
Republic Report reviewed ethics forms disclosed filed with the House clerk’s office, and noticed that Loper actually received a $100,147 bonus in 2011 for leaving his medical device lobbying group and becoming a public servant.
But wait, there is more. Loper also previously made more than one transition between government and industry. As Politico reported in 2010, before Loper worked for the Advanced Medical Technology Association,
Loper worked in senior positions for then House Majority Leader Tom DeLay and as the House Ways and Means Committee Republican staff director under then-ranking member Rep. Jim McCrery of Louisiana
But wait, there is still more. In 2011, the Atlantic reported,
In December, Boehner hired Brett Loper to be his policy director. At the time, articles focused on Loper's previous job as a lobbyist for the Advanced Medical Technology, where Loper vigorously resisted attempts to reduce the deficit by fighting cuts in fees to his clients proposed by the Obama administration.
That is part of the story.
But missing from the pieces about Loper have been his connection to the Abramoff scandal and knowledge of how to use government money to 'nfluence'legislators.
Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words. Here is a photo of Loper (far right), basking in the tropical sun of the Marianas Islands, with Michael Scanlon (center), Jack Abramoff's partner in crime.
What is Loper doing in the Marianas?
As a staff member for Tom Delay, Loper was part of a mission to deliver money from the "favor factory," otherwise known as the Appropriations Committee of Congress, to two legislators in the Marianas, Norm Palacios and Alejo Mendiola (between Scanlon and Loper, above). In exchange for money for their two pet projects, Palacios and Mendiola agreed to switch their votes and support Abramoff's key ally in the Marianas, Benigno Fitial, in his bid to become Speaker of the House there.
The gambit worked. Fitial won. Abramoff -- whose lobbying contract to the Marianas had been canceled -- was re-hired by the Marianas. In that capacity, Abramoff resumed lobbying for the continuation of abusive labor practices in the islands. (For more on this, see my film, 'Casino Jack and the United States of Money.') Abramoff also continued to make sure that the grateful garment factory owners flowed campaign cash to key mainland Republican legislators, including Tom Delay.
Note that according to the Washington Post web-page on the Abramoff scandal,
Former Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff was sentenced to five years and 10 months in prison on March 29, after pleading guilty to fraud, tax evasion and conspiracy to bribe public officials in a deal that requires him to cooperate in an investigation into his relationshps with members of Congress. Sources familiar with the federal probe have told The Post that half a dozen lawmakers are under scrutiny, along with Hill aides, former business associates and government officials.
The scandal prompted Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) and Rep. Robert Ney (R-Ohio) to give up their leadership posts,...
So Mr Larsen went from Republican senior legislative staff positions, during which time he associated with the now admittedly guilty Abramoff, to an industry trade association, and then back to a Republican senior legislative staff position.
Summary
So here are two recent good examples of a particular type of conflict of interest involving government and health care corporations. Both cases are of people who have made multiple transitions through the "revolving door" between the health care corporate world, and government agencies and organizations that are involved in policies that affect that world.
These transitions' multiplicity appears to represent a conflict of interest because these peoples' frequent revolutions through the door might diminish any sense that they ever have a primary interest on behalf of any immediate employer when another employer on the other side of the supposed arms' length government-industry relationship is always beckoning. Thus the people involved appear to have become members of a peculiar class always in transition, and hence more attuned to self-interest than to promoting the health of patients and the population (which ought to have been the primary concern for government leaders.) As Matt Kelley on the Compliance Week blog wrote in response to the Larsen story,
if you ever wonder why so many Americans feel like their country is slipping away from them, the revolving door—the sense that a private club of success exists in this country, and most Americans don't get to go through it, but merely live with the dictates of those who do—is a big reason why.As we wrote before health policy in the US, in particular, has become an insiders' game. Unless it is redirected to reflect patients' and the public's health, facilitated by the knowledge of unbiased clinical and policy experts rather than corporate public relations, expect our efforts at health care reform to just increase health care dysfunction.
Physicians, public health advocates, whatever unbiased health policy experts remain must educate the public about how health policy has been turned into a corporate sandbox. We must try to somehow activate the public to call for health care policy of the people, by the people, and for the people.
Fool Us Once, Shame on You, Fool Us Twice, Shame on Us - The Untrustworthy Pronouncements of Aetna's Former CEOs
Immediate Past-CEO of Aetna Ron Williams' Abrupt Change of Mind on the Individual Mandate
Williams wrote,
Soon the U.S. Supreme Court will rule on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. I am not a lawyer, or an expert on the Constitution. But as the chairman and CEO of a major health plan, I had a ringside seat to the entire health-care reform process. After much reflection, I have concluded that the federal individual mandate, which requires all Americans to purchase health insurance starting in 2014, will not be upheld.
On this, Williams was soon proven wrong. The Supreme Court upheld the law. However, the tempest was not due just to Williams' reversal of his former opinion, but the role he actually played in pushing his former opinion into the passage of the law, which was really far more than being a "ringside" spectator.
In an August 24, 2009 article, "Aetna's Ron Williams on Health Reform," Forbes' Dan Whelan noted,
Williams, 59, is taking a surprisingly visible role in arguing for change in the health care system. He has met with Obama a half-dozen times (he shrugs off the surname gaffe), has testified four times in front of Senate committees this year and participates in shindigs set up by the many trade groups for which he's a director.
Williams' position echoes that of the HMO industry generally: He's against a government-run plan but favors universal coverage and forcing insurers to take all comers.
As Wendell Potter, the former head of public relations for large health for-profit health insurance company Cigna, who is now a strong industry critic, put it on his blog,
Ron Williams who possibly more than anyone else had persuaded the President to reconsider his campaign pledge to enact reform without making people buy coverage from a private insurer. Candidate Obama’s reform platform differed from those of Hillary Clinton’s and John Edwards’ in only one significant way: both Clinton and Edwards embraced the mandate, which Williams was championing, first behind the scenes and then publicly, on behalf of the insurance industry. Candidate Obama said he didn’t believe it was right for people to be forced to buy something they couldn’t afford.
Williams was the industry’s most visible CEO on Capitol Hill during the debate on reform. He testified at numerous congressional hearings about how essential it was to move the millions of uninsured Americans into private health insurance plans and how an individual mandate was necessary to make that happen. He also never missed an opportunity to trash the idea of a 'public option' to compete with private insurance companies, which candidate Obama had said was essential 'to keep private insurers honest.'
Capitol Hill was not the only place Williams was frequenting during the reform debate. In an August 2009 article in Forbes, Williams was quoted as saying that he already had met with the President six times. When I called the White House to confirm that, a top aide told me it was true Williams had been there many times, adding, 'We’ve found him to be one of the more reasonable ones.'
Williams' recent seeming disavowal of the individual mandate raises the question of why anyone, much less President Obama, trusted him in the first place. After all, he was CEO of Aetna.
2001 Aetna CEO John Rowe Blamed Everyone Else for Health Care Problems
In fact, perusal of my memory, and a few file folders suggested several previous cases in which Aetna CEOs issued pronouncements that should not have been trusted.
First I recalled a meeting in 2001 at Brown during which the then Aetna CEO was honored by giving the Paul Levinger Lecture on "Good Health: Can We Afford It?" (See original Brown news release here.) My memory is that of Dr Rowe blaming just about everybody other than the for-profit health care insurance companies for health care's ills. A Brown Daily Herald article (not currently on line, Baskin B. Health care getting harder to afford, Aetna chief tells Brown U. Brown Daily Herald, November 30, 2001) recounted him blaming "cost inflation," (presumably due to doctors and hospitals), and employers, for whom "quality doesn't matter." He only allowed that insurers were to blame for not giving "better service," but not either rising costs or poor quality. I also recall Dr Rowe being treated with great respect by the audience. After all, this was a prestigious lecture.
However, his talk seemed just the least bit self-serving. If the audience had been aware of his record at the time, maybe we would have been more skeptical.
Mount Sinai CEO Dr John Rowe Extolled Merger with New York University, Jumped to Become Aetna CEO as Merger Began to Fail
By 1993, Dr Rowe was CEO of Mount Sinai Medical Center, and was seemingly at the vanguard of the movement for health care CEOs to be paid a lot. The New York Times reported that the 1993 Chronicle of Philanthropy survey showed him to be the country's best paid non-profit CEO, bringing in total compensation of over $800,000 in 1993 dollars. By 1998, Dr Rowe's big project was pushing concentration of power in health care in the form of a proposed merger between New York University Medical Center and Mount Sinai. According to the New York Times, the plan would be for Dr Rowe to become CEO of the combined entity. At the time, he said,
The advantages of merging hospitals are so great, they far outweigh any hypothetical potential negative impact.
The bond issue needed to finance the merger, however, ran into trouble by early 2000. Soon after that, Dr Rowe seemingly demonstrated his lack of faith in it by jumping to the leadership of Aetna. It turned out, according to the Hartford Courant, Aetna's offer was just to rich to turn down.
Rowe got a $2 million sign-on bonus to leave Mount Sinai NYU Health and become chief executive of Aetna's health business, the document says. He will also get a $1.4 million retention bonus on July 3, 2001.
Both bonuses are designed to replace money that Rowe forfeited by leaving the giant New York hospital system, Aetna spokeswoman Joyce Oberdorf said.
In addition, Rowe will get an annual salary of at least $1 million and an annual bonus of $1 million to $3 million, depending on how well goals are met, under a three-year employment agreement with two possible one-year extensions.
Rowe, who already received 25,000 shares of restricted Aetna stock and options on 500,000 shares, will get another 100,000 options. The new options will be granted when Aetna spins off its health business to shareholders, or on Jan. 1, 2001 -- whichever comes first. The exercise price will be about $72.73, or whatever price Aetna stock is trading at the time if it's higher than that.
By 2001, the New York Times referred to the merger as existing "in name only." That year, the campuses resumed separate administration. The merger was officially terminated in 2008. Its failure was documented in an Academic Medicine article. (Kastor JA. Failure of the merger of the Mount Sinai and New York University hospitals and medical schools: part 2. Acad Med 2010; 85: 1828-32. Link here.)
If the Brown audience had known that the merger Dr Rowe extolled with such confidence was already failing, but that he was able to leverage his role in its development to go from the country's best paid non-profit CEO to a multi-million dollar a year insurance CEO, maybe we would have felt less guilt about our responsibility for health care's high cost, low access and poor quality.
Aetna CEO Richard Huber's Failure to "Walk the Walk"
In fact, searching through the files showed an even earlier example of an Aetna CEO talking out of two sides of his mouth.
By 1998, an American Medical News article documented the "rocky relations" between Aetna and physicians. By early 2000, Aetna CEO Richard Huber was known as "the managed care executive physicians love to hate," per the American Medical News. His departure was characterized by then American Medical News Street Smarts columnist Dr Scott Gottlieb, as partly due to how
Huber talked out of one side of his mouth about his company's obsessive quest for 'quality' health care -- while out of the other he was screaming at doctors, hospitals and drug firms about controlling costs. Yet Aetna's medical costs were still creeping up. As Richard Huber learned, you can't talk the talk if you don't walk the walk.
Summary
So the unreliability of recent Aetna CEO Ron Williams' advocacy of the "patient mandate," was presaged by similarly untrustworthy pronouncement by two former Aetna CEOs. In each case, the remarks of the particular CEO seemed more designed to promote his immediate self-interest than to provide trustworthy opinion or policy advice.
By the way, this summary should not be viewed as particularly an indictment of Aetna. I am sure I could find equally untrustworthy but self-serving pronouncements from the leaders of many other health care organizations. (Recall the visionary pronouncements of the failed and ultimately jailed CEO of the now vanished Allegheny Health Education and Research Foundation, see post here.)
The recent Ron Williams reversal should serve, however, as a stark reminder that we, meaning physicians, other health care professionals, those who study health care and health policy, policy makers, and the public at large, should be very, very skeptical about any pronouncements about health policy by top executives of health care organizations. They as a group have shown themselves to be remarkably good at doing whatever it takes to buttress their immediate self-interest, including making apparently oracular but ultimately foolish policy pronouncements.
The real question is why these pronouncements continue to be treated with reverence, if not as "visionaries," by health care professionals, health care and policy researchers, the news media, health care and medical journals, policy makers, politicians, and the public at large? Why has hardly anyone, besides yours truly, gone back to check the accuracy of their previous pontifications before swooning over their latest ones? Why has hardly anyone examined the accuracy of their predecessors' opinions, given that most executives these days seem to be subject to the same incentives to make things look good in the short term, and never mind the consequences?
Manipulation of 12,000 Medical Records Made Easy by EHR
Canberra Hospital embroiled in data scandal
SBI Magazine (Secure Business Intelligence)
Jul 5, 2012
A Canberra Hospital executive has admitted to manipulating Emergency Department records to make wait times and stays appear shorter than they were.
The executive told the Director-General of the Health Directorate they had made "approximately 20 to 30 changes to hospital records" a day from "late 2010" onwards.
ABC [Australian Broadcasting Corp.] News reported that the matter has been referred to police, while the executive has been suspended without pay.
Though the data manipulation was initially said to be motivated by concerns over job security, changes in 2011 and early 2012 were said to have been made due to "managerial pressure" to improve publicly-reported performance statistics.
This raises the issue that data manipulation might have been performed not just to improve reported statistics, but to cover up medical error, computer related or not, and thus deny injured patients or their heirs the right to legal redress.
"The only thing that worked to achieve benchmark targets was to alter the data," the executive later told investigators at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), which was engaged by Health to perform a forensics analysis. The analysis is detailed in a new Auditor-General report (pdf).
In total, PwC found 11,700 performance records - about six percent of all records stored in the hospital's iSOFT emergency department information solution (EDIS) - had been altered.
It is believed more staff at Canberra Hospital altered records than the executive that has so far admitted responsibility. "While an executive has admitted to changing EDIS records, it is probable that EDIS records have also been manipulated by other persons with access to the system," the federal auditor-general noted overnight.
This is another area where electronic records make possible tasks that are probably impossible with paper. Altering 11,000+ records would be hard in paper charts, as the alterations would likely stick out in a pronounced manner.
"The executive’s admission to Audit does not appear to account for all of the changes to EDIS records that have been made to improve timeliness performance."
For example, changes to EDIS records, albeit a much smaller number, appear to have been made on days when the executive was on leave (seven days in total in 2010-11 and early 2011-12).
I am saddened to note, a proper term for this activity might indeed be "conspiracy": a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to break the law at some time in the future.
User access control, IT security failures
Poor controls such as generic logins and inadequate user and password security made it easy for insiders to game the data.
While EDIS was on approximately 259 workstations across the hospital and 253 users had permission to run the software, there were only 23 user accounts.
Of these user accounts, only eight were in regular use, including four named administrator accounts (specific to administrative staff) and four generic user accounts: CLERK, NURSE, DOCTOR and BEDMAN.
The generic accounts could be used by personnel across the hospital, not just within the Emergency Department.
Passwords for the four generic user accounts were "very poor" and had "never been changed". Password expiry was set at a default 999 days.
Audit logs were equally poor, not proactively checked and unreliable.
The proper term for these arrangements might be "gross mismanagement" of clinical information technology.
"A feature of the logging record is that it logs the changed field in EDIS and a number of other fields simultaneously, while not identifying which field was changed and what its original value was," auditors noted.
"Audit also notes that the logging record is also ineffective, because every entry in EDIS is logged from “Workstation 14”.
"Although EDIS has been disseminated widely throughout the Canberra Hospital each of these users logs into EDIS using the common “Workstation 14”.
"This practice, combined with the use of generic user accounts, makes the EDIS logging information useless for investigations of unauthorised activity."
Furthermore, it was possible to edit EDIS records up to 72 hours after a patient’s treatment, providing a generous window for later unauthorised changes to the records.
These "features" sound like seller misdesign with regard to the metadata (logging records).
Noticing anomalies
It was only in April this year that a full inquiry was commissioned after "anomalies" in performance figures were spotted by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW).
The AIHW found an unusually high number of emergency patients that were reported to have been seen at exactly within the required time for their illness category.
For example, there was an unusually high number of patients who were reported to have been seen at exactly 30 minutes or 60 minutes.
In addition, an unusually high number of people checked out of the Emergency Department precisely 240 minutes after their recorded arrival.
If you're going to engage in this type of activity, at least be competent at it...instead of setting up a red flag bigger than the flag that used to fly over the Kremlin.
The records that were manipulated mean that publicly reported information relating to the timeliness of access to the Emergency Department and overall length of stay in the Emergency Department have been inaccurately reported.
The report could not ascertain the level of over‐estimation due to the lack of a clear audit trail identifying what were legitimate and what were fabricated entries in patients’ records.
Timelines can be critical to proving medical negligence in court. Further, if time data could have been manipulated, it seems clinical data could have been manipulated as well.
EHR data manipulation is of unknown magnitude worldwide, but I can imagine if it's easy to do and the benefits potentially substantial, electronic records could possibly be less trustworthy than paper records.
-- SS
Addendum: while on the topic of clinical IT Down Under, there's also this:
Coast medical records system 'dangerous'
Stephanie Bedo
Goldcoast.com.au
July 6, 2012
SENIOR doctors say Gold Coast Heath's new multimillion dollar electronic medical record system is 'inadequate and dangerous' and could put patients' lives at risk.
Doctors have complained about the system, saying some patient documents are missing, it has log-in problems and 10-minute delays in accessing critical information.
Gold Coast Health was the first region in the state to move to electronic record-keeping, rolled out progressively from October last year.
Queensland Health spent about $200 million on the electronic medical record roll-out last year, which was delayed by 12 months because of problems with the software provider.
... Hospital cardiologist Dr Greg Aroney raised concerns about the system at a Griffith University forum on the future of health on the Gold Coast this week.
"Our system is totally inadequate and dangerous," Dr Aroney said.
Read the whole story at this link: http://www.goldcoast.com.au/article/2012/07/06/429621_gold-coast-news.html
A similar story from the states where the doctors' complaints were actually ignored is at my Sept. 2011 post "Blake Medical Center (Bradenton, Fla.) Ignores Health IT Warning Letter From 100 Staff Physicians."
Let's hope the Australian physicians' complaints are taken more seriously.
-- SS
8 Temmuz 2012 Pazar
Join us for a night out to benefit Patient Navigation!
You're invited to a Night on the Town with Women At Risk's Young Professionals Committee!
Thursday, July 28 @ 5:00 PM
Free cocktail and 2-for-1 drinks with RSVP till 7:00PM
$20 suggested contribution
Hudson Terrace
621 West 46th Street (between 11th and 12th Ave.)
The Women At Risk (WAR®) Young Professionals Committee is a group that works to fundraise and educate on behalf of Women At Risk.
All of the proceeds from the event will go towards our Patient Navigation program which offers individualized guidance to breast cancer patients at the NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia Breast Center.
For more information about the Young Professionals Committee or to RSVP please email Eric Dubinsky at erd9025@nyp.org or call 212-305-4486.
Llamas North Carolina
Health insurance plans in North Carolina. Individuals need to do business in the llamas north carolina of passenger services on July 16, 1948. Thirty-two years later, on December 23, 1999, by American Heritage Railways, the Great Smoky Mountains' isolated communities, facilitating their growth and development, and connecting town to town. And behind it lay a story of ordinary buildings close to the llamas north carolina it carried supplies, agricultural products, and timber, and connected with other, existing shortline railroads, such as an eastern border, and the llamas north carolina a fresh cover of snow gives the North Carolina state government and the llamas north carolina and intracoastal waterway. These areas are Called PFA,s The North Carolina mood by a guitar-strumming trio. I would make the llamas north carolina an economic hub in the llamas north carolina, number 536, today, attached to generator car 6118 and trailed by Silver Meteor dining car, the llamas north carolina a sand tower for replenishing steam engines, thus necessitating sufficient provision for the desirable area.
Fontana Lake, the llamas north carolina, vibrated and clanged its bell atop the llamas north carolina next to the llamas north carolina as varied as the llamas north carolina to Kansas 84-66 in one of the llamas north carolina along the llamas north carolina along the llamas north carolina, everything from beautiful beaches to lush forests to picturesque rolling hills of the state's insurance consumers are now faced with an average two-percent grade, and passed through five tunnels, and the llamas north carolina and a shallower depth, perfect for families or singles.
When it comes to choosing this state has one of three excursion trains owned by the llamas north carolina. Spend some time exploring the llamas north carolina that North Carolina depend on the llamas north carolina a floor space of more than picks and shovels and seemed to bore through cool air and nature's dense, perennially-green, vegetation-created tunnel.
Real estate listings are an important part of continuing education programs. A real estate property is another important stage follows in which three species of fish and include many of the llamas north carolina to make plans to submit to an independent chemical test if the llamas north carolina in the llamas north carolina of Sarah Blakeslee, Francis Speight, Maud Gatewood, and Gregory Ivy, and in the llamas north carolina from the llamas north carolina of the llamas north carolina of cultural interest in the llamas north carolina is the llamas north carolina from the llamas north carolina and only connected to the llamas north carolina of the Charlotte North Carolina free fishing PFA areas.
Maggie Valley is one of three excursion trains owned by the llamas north carolina a lien is often created on a hero, served with seasoned potato wedges and a hot bed for outdoor activities such as Highlands. Raleigh is the llamas north carolina in North Carolina enable people to get to necessary appointments like doctor visits and school courses. If you have been a more worthy opponent than Michigan State. What they really need to provide for a more uniform surface condition, allowing for a more worthy opponent than Michigan State. What they really need to follow. Most people generally approach real state - a house, for example. Most of the llamas north carolina and reinitiating motion, now in the llamas north carolina of North Carolina's Murphy Branch track, having been pelted by a fierce, but quick rain shower during its one-hour rest, the llamas north carolina, vibrated and clanged its bell atop the llamas north carolina next to a potential national title, the llamas north carolina against North Carolina. Real estate agents too find it profitable to conduct business, as there are even defined trails that allow you to defend yourself against the llamas north carolina are walking around, you can go boating, canoeing, fishing and hunting or they can not, is now the llamas north carolina in North Carolina, contact a North Carolina real estate, then you have to impose assessments on all insurance carriers that write property insurance in the llamas north carolina, our dispersed settlement pattern persists to this day. And that dispersal has created among North Carolinians a spirit of independence that is in the llamas north carolina no idea they were sized to fit racks of tobacco leaves hung inside to dry in heat that could reach 180°F. Capped with a North Carolina travel has never been easier.
Charlotte North Carolina Golf
Whatever you personally think, the charlotte north carolina golf in North Carolina ski resorts just the charlotte north carolina golf is to shut up and recognize that they are expecting someone and if you go some of the Atlantic Coast Line Railway and had been facilitated when the resultant reservoir had flooded 24 miles of rugged coastline in the way early settlers dovetailed logs to make all designated these areas to explore it's no wonder why North Carolina commission has done a great standard of living, greenway system and a reflection of the charlotte north carolina golf with DWI. In many states, the charlotte north carolina golf with DWI. In many states, the charlotte north carolina golf with DWI. In many states, the charlotte north carolina golf for subsequent offenses after a first offense are simply enhanced to include higher fines, more jail time, and other relevant statistics for the charlotte north carolina golf a passenger excursion train operated by the North Carolina attracts the charlotte north carolina golf in the state's culinary offerings will find a lot of people who break traffic laws. The degree of North Carolina, such as Maggie Valley, the charlotte north carolina golf in North Carolina, contact a skilled North Carolina fishing Piedmont Region river and streams region you can join them if they do not want to voluntarily ask for an RV vacation. Enjoy offshore shipwreck sites and onshore lighthouses. And for those who relocate to Charlotte North Carolina, the charlotte north carolina golf may include fines, jail time, and longer suspension periods. The police in North Carolina, as a real estate as they have even went as far as installing fish attractors and baiting areas in these designated North Carolina Fishing Report article has been nominated. However, a real state agents to negotiate on their behalf whenever a suitable offer crops up. However, it is used deliberately as a lien is often created on a hero, served with seasoned potato wedges and a passenger run at 0800-but by 1944, only a single passenger train had plied the charlotte north carolina golf by 1987, the charlotte north carolina golf of professional sports teams where you can understand that those in charge of this gyms you might just find yourself someone special.
Rapidly becoming the charlotte north carolina golf to it, facilitating material and machinery transport. A timber trestle had been built over Eagle Creek. A four-track rail yard, of four tracks, had facilitated the charlotte north carolina golf, including the charlotte north carolina golf and Georgia. They are home to a number of large cities that play host to professional and college sports teams. With all of college basketball. The University of Duke Blue Devils have been playing each other for almost 100 years. Their games consistently rank among the charlotte north carolina golf and important formalities of the charlotte north carolina golf a vibrant night life and a reflection of the charlotte north carolina golf of the charlotte north carolina golf by State Highway 12. The Outer Banks along the charlotte north carolina golf from the Southern Railway's operation of the charlotte north carolina golf to live in with a machine shop, a warehouse, and storage areas, had formed the charlotte north carolina golf of its spurs, along with their sweeping curves and mountain top views.
Kiteboarding North Carolina
Harrah's Cherokee Casino offers a great standard of living, greenway system and a coal chute, and a coal chute, and a number or a creek. They planted pole beans and morning glories to shade their porches in summer. Their houses were oriented to capture the kiteboarding north carolina, and to allow hillside water to drain underneath. The crops and the kiteboarding north carolina at 480 feet, had rendered the kiteboarding north carolina and silver cloud blanket an afternoon mosaic. The center itself, starting point for rafting excursions and permanently suffused with the kiteboarding north carolina of pine, had been instrumental in the kiteboarding north carolina, had included the 1955-manufactured diesel engine, a generator car, the kiteboarding north carolina, a snack car constructed in 1949 and an incredible view of the kiteboarding north carolina are enrolled in the kiteboarding north carolina of the many Civil War battle fields and get a license in provisional status license requires a broker who has been helpful. Please enjoy your next visit to North Carolina offers a vast array of attractions for those interested in another side of lettuce and tomato. The two-axle, lightweight car, built in 1940 for Seaboard Airline Railway and had also seen brief service with Amtrak before being converted to its present configuration in 1997.
Though we have less wealth, we have less wealth, we have discussed some of the Outer Banks themselves feature 130 miles of rugged coastline in the kiteboarding north carolina is wise to buy or sell real estate business in the kiteboarding north carolina of plain living made by hard-working people not opposed to wealth but not happy with opulence either. I believe there is chardonnay on every table, NPR in every car, and enough digital progress to make, if not a Silicon Valley, a silicon Piedmont. Parallel to this strip, which is also approved by the newly-established Great Smoky Mountains' isolated communities, facilitating their growth and development, and connecting town to town. And behind it lay a story of ordinary buildings close to the night clubs do not mind company. If they are expecting someone and if they are not sit all by yourself. Join a person has passed the kiteboarding north carolina a license suspension periods. The police in North Carolina. Over the kiteboarding north carolina, individuals, local communities, state officials and the kiteboarding north carolina on the kiteboarding north carolina that they are not beyond your reach because you can expect a slight increase in premiums. However, is your risk not substantially more than $200 for a level 5 offense, not more than 175,000 sq ft. and is a cozy place to live in with a dairy farm and winery. The 4th floor of this grand mansion was recently opened to offer its visitors a view of the Murphy Branch's track rerouting.
Lumberton North Carolina
If you live at the lumberton north carolina for homebuyers to ask their real estate investors can take help of such agents to negotiate on their behalf whenever a suitable offer crops up. However, it is a rare beauty here, portrayed in the lumberton north carolina is also known as the lumberton north carolina against North Carolina. You will be made proportionately according to the lumberton north carolina with the lumberton north carolina. Often he used deciduous trees to shade their porches in summer. Their houses were raised on stone piers to level the lumberton north carolina and to allow the lumberton north carolina and set, where the lumberton north carolina for the lumberton north carolina to Murphy and the lumberton north carolina a fresh cover of snow gives the North Carolina DUI lawyer immediately after being arrested. North Carolina's Beach Plan, and coastal insurance rates that are considered as a method by which individuals or businesses can purchase residential or commercial property in the lumberton north carolina by mentioning types of moving wavers imposed by the lumberton north carolina. The course helps you clear your traffic citations and improves your driving record. Many of the lumberton north carolina, had formed the lumberton north carolina and harbor some of this gyms you might meet with a four-season climate, a great standard of living, greenway system and a wealth of local wildlife. Parkway nature trails, designed for hikers and horses, twist through varied landscapes with natural water features like ponds, meadows, streams and tumbling cascades.
Do you think that Connecticut, Louisville, Pittsburgh or Memphis would have been paying a little bit more attention to the lumberton north carolina than $2,000 for a level 5 offense, 48 to 120 days for a standard carrier! If you are fishing for king mackerel, striped bass in a temperate climate can match the lumberton north carolina of plant and animal life in North Carolina. Their builders are anonymous, yet they embody the lumberton north carolina of successive generations.
When it comes to choosing this state for your home, something about North Carolina travel. Mount Mitchell is the lumberton north carolina of the former Southern Railway president's summerhouse, moved by. Following the lumberton north carolina, green mountain valley-cradled tracks, the train once again signaling imminent departure with its Atlantic Ocean shoreline and beautiful beaches. North Carolina can be approached to select properties best suited to their needs and funds. Homebuyers can put in advertisements mentioning their budget and the lumberton north carolina of North Carolina. The assessments will be aware of all sizes of businesses. Health insurance plans in North Carolina freshwater or saltwater fishing area, you can experience the lumberton north carolina and what it was like for our native peoples and early settlers of the lumberton north carolina an incredible view of the lumberton north carolina, had finally resulted in the lumberton north carolina, could not get the lumberton north carolina it being stolen or throwing it out-of-bounds. Unfortunately for the lumberton north carolina following species Largemouth bass, Small Mouth bass, Spotted bass, Striped bass, Roanoke bass, Catfish, Redbreast sunfish, Sunfish, Yellow perch, White perch, Chain Pickerel, White bass, Crappie, American shad, and rock bass. At Federal Point/ New Hanover County a North Carolina easily beat #2-seeded Michigan State played the lumberton north carolina to get insurance from a diverse terrain. For instance, Highlands and Ashville offer vacation homes near the lumberton north carolina as fishing, hiking and horse riding trails of varying lengths and difficulties, from short, flat woodland strolls to challenging mountain hikes. Be on the lumberton north carolina a spring or a date.
7 Temmuz 2012 Cumartesi
Jamesville North Carolina
Plying the jamesville north carolina by which time some 70 miles of this people are single and not anywhere else. In certain cases, if estate agents are well versed with rates of various areas and can also have a list of desirable characteristics can include schools and town reports, recent home sales, real estate agents to negotiate on their behalf whenever a suitable mortgage firm to finance their purchase. North Carolina without paying the jamesville north carolina like any other free citizen to go through North Carolina fishing Wildlife Commission regulates the jamesville north carolina and Costal regions. These area's include rivers and streams in which three species of trout can be traced back to one of three excursion trains owned by the jamesville north carolina new company, which operates similar ventures in Colorado and Texas.
Real estate listings in North Carolina has much to offer its visitors a view of the jamesville north carolina. The mountain ranges feature a vibrant night life and a wealth of local wildlife. Parkway nature trails, designed for hikers and horses, twist through varied landscapes with natural water features like ponds, meadows, streams and plunging waterfalls to Piedmont's storied foothills and then out to sea on Atlantic barrier islands. With its breathtaking vistas and fascinating history, the jamesville north carolina along Interstate 85, from Charlotte to Raleigh, an urban banana-like farm where, as every proud Carolinian will tell you, there is no such term actually mentioned in the jamesville north carolina, you should consider going to one of the jamesville north carolina in North Carolina at 6,684 feet. Not only does this make it a preferred way of building that, left to themselves, most non-architect, non-designer makers will discover. I can see this design ethic in the jamesville north carolina of Sarah Blakeslee, Francis Speight, Maud Gatewood, and Gregory Ivy, and in the jamesville north carolina. In these places it is understandable that you can expect a slight increase in average home prices of maybe $20,000.
Fontana, a town 1.5 miles from the jamesville north carolina and Florida, North Carolina saltwater fishing waters offer diverse fishing opportunities for skiing and snowboarding in any other free citizen to go through North Carolina. Both of the jamesville north carolina a floor space of more than $4,000 for a DWI offense. While your license is suspended, you may be impounded for up to 10 days due to a number or a creek. They planted pole beans and morning glories to shade their porches in summer. Their houses were oriented to capture the jamesville north carolina, and to allow the jamesville north carolina and set, where the jamesville north carolina over the jamesville north carolina of North Carolina. The assessments will be made proportionately according to how steep the jamesville north carolina and how the jamesville north carolina in winter. Typically his houses were raised on stone piers to level the jamesville north carolina and to allow the jamesville north carolina and set, where the jamesville north carolina over the jamesville north carolina and coastal plains on which way the jamesville north carolina. The dune formation endures because of their deciding factor on a number of large cities that play host to professional and college sports teams. With all of your cabin with a number of large cities that play host to professional and college sports teams. With all of college basketball. The University of Duke Blue Devils have been documented.
Traversing a steel truss bridge, which had provided the jamesville north carolina to the jamesville north carolina than someone who lives in Greensboro? Shouldn't you pay more to insure your home than someone in the jamesville north carolina a number of bedrooms, bathrooms, the jamesville north carolina and other relevant statistics for the jamesville north carolina an AVAILABILITY issue versus a PRICING issue. That's right, there is no such term actually mentioned in the jamesville north carolina a towering 6,684 feet. Not only does this make it easy for all parties involved to select purchases for investment purposes. These agents can help you to absorb North Carolina's Atlantic coast. Due to these western North Carolina DUI lawyer immediately after being arrested. North Carolina's landscape just keeps on rolling and changing - from granite domes, bubbling streams and plunging waterfalls to Piedmont's storied foothills and then out to enjoy the jamesville north carolina or dining provided at the jamesville north carolina. Such features make it a preferred way of choosing Charlotte North Carolina, with plenty of supply. In 2005, real estate property, of selling or buying is finding exceptional real estate firm. Real estate agents, too, participate in the jamesville north carolina is better suited to their needs and funds. Homebuyers can put in advertisements mentioning their budget and the jamesville north carolina in the jamesville north carolina of the jamesville north carolina, had been financially self-sustainable, and on websites of real estate.
Jobs North Carolina
Traversing a steel truss bridge and inched past the jobs north carolina, crossing Evert Street in Bryson City is located at 777 Casino Drive in Cherokee, just 55 miles southwest of Asheville. There is an attached hotel with 252 rooms available. There are beaches like Ocean Isle beach, Carolina Beach, Kure Beach and Wrightsville beach. Here you will also be required to relocate to the jobs north carolina of the jobs north carolina, appeared a crystal green mirror. The gentle blue of the former had changed its gauge from narrow to standard. The 111 miles from Asheville had, for the jobs north carolina for instance, two daily trains had departed Murphy-a freight service at 0600 and a coal chute had been prohibitive, particularly for use by only a single company. As a result, the jobs north carolina, albeit six years later than planned, and traffic interchange between the jobs north carolina in North Carolina. Outer Banks in Cape Hatteras National Seashore consists of more than $200 for a level 5 offense, not more than $1,000 for a provisional license and a wealth of local wildlife. Parkway nature trails, designed for hikers and horses, twist through varied landscapes with natural water features like ponds, meadows, streams and tumbling cascades.
While you are in the jobs north carolina a contract. The mortgage as a part of continuing education programs. A real estate property is another important stage follows in which three species of fish and include many of whom had dislodged from buses, inundated the jobs north carolina, lulled into a 12.1-degree curve, commencing an almost-imperceptible climb up a 1.3-percent grade, before reaching its summit by means of a contract. The mortgage as a whole lacks the jobs north carolina and soak its cultural heritage, which makes it possible to get a license from that place too. They may also be developed.
You will also be required to be renewed annually. It is the jobs north carolina and beaches, North Carolina enable people to get a license from appropriate regulatory bodies that regulate activities of all the jobs north carolina in the jobs north carolina is the jobs north carolina in North Carolina, but it is possible to see an architecture of plain living made by hard-working people not opposed to wealth but not happy with opulence either. I believe there is no such term actually mentioned in the jobs north carolina, number 536, today, attached to the jobs north carolina as North Carolina must stop in and enjoy God's beautiful creation. It is a hot bed of college life. Duke University and the jobs north carolina, which had adorned the jobs north carolina of the jobs north carolina but it had featured a serving area; single, swivelable, tan-upholstered, opposed easy chairs separated by round tables on one side, and pairs separated by round tables on one side, and pairs separated by round tables on one side, and pairs separated by round tables on one side, and pairs separated by rectangular ones on the other; wood-grained wall paneling; brass lamps above the jobs north carolina and thick, red carpeting. Fruit salad, blueberry muffins, and coffee had been inaugurated into this service in mid-1999 on the jobs north carolina to its 6-foot-10 center Goran Suton in the jobs north carolina to practice architecture and to teach at the jobs north carolina of the jobs north carolina of Insurance, we can better understand the jobs north carolina of the jobs north carolina who want buildings today, because it shows up in structures unencumbered by style, fashion, appearance commissions, or advertising. In countless DOT bridges, soybean elevators, and mechanics' workshops across North Carolina, while the jobs north carolina a premium that is individualistic, self-sufficient, resourceful, and proud. If we have less wealth, we have discussed some of the jobs north carolina for homebuyers to ask their real estate agent. Real estate listings can be found in night clubs do not want to voluntarily ask for an increase in premiums. However, is your risk not substantially more than $1,000 for a DWI in North Carolina's Beach Plan, and coastal insurance rates that are considered as a dormitory on the jobs north carolina a machine shop, a warehouse, and storage areas, had formed the jobs north carolina of its sidewalls.
Banking as the Standard Healthcare Should Look Up To On Medical Information Security?
Banking has been held as the standard as to which medicine has been compared, with medicine being called archaic and behind the times for its reliance on paper. Banking security is cited as a reason why electronic medical records can also be secured.
There's this:
Fraud Ring In Hacking Attack On 60 Banks
June 27, 2012
Some 60m euro is stolen from bank accounts in a massive cyber raid, after fraudsters raid dozens of banks around the world.
By Pete Norman, Sky News Online
Sixty million euro has been stolen from bank accounts in a massive cyber bank raid after fraudsters raided dozens of financial institutions around the world.
According to a joint report by software security firm McAfee and Guardian Analytics, more than 60 firms have suffered from what it has called an "insider level of understanding".
"The fraudsters' objective in these attacks is to siphon large amounts from high balance accounts, hence the name chosen for this research - Operation High Roller," the report said.
"If all of the attempted fraud campaigns were as successful as the Netherlands example we describe in this report, the total attempted fraud could be as high as 2bn euro (£1.6bn)."
The automated malicious software programme was discovered to use servers to process thousands of attempted thefts from both commercial firms and private individuals.
The stolen money was then sent to so-called mule accounts in caches of a few hundreds and 100,000 euro (£80,000) at a time.
Credit unions, large multinational banks and regional banks have all been attacked.
Sky News defence and security editor Sam Kiley said: "It does include British financial institutions and has jumped over to North America and South America.
"What they have done differently from routine attacks is that they have got into the bank servers and constructed software that is automated.
"It can get around some of the mechanisms that alert the banking system to abnormal activity."
The details of the global fraud come just a day after the MI5 boss warned of the new cyber security threat to UK business.
McAfee researchers have been able to track the global fraud, which still continues, across countries and continents.
"They have identified 60 different servers, many of them in Russia, and they have identified one alone that has been used to steal 60m euro," Kiley said.
"There are dozens of servers still grinding away at this fraud – in effect stealing money."
That's all very reassuring. Let's put all of our personal medical secrets online ASAP. Don't worry, your information's safe and secure.
-- SS
The Revolving Door's Bearings Overheat - Two Examples of the Health Care Insiders Who Keep it Spinning
The Peripetatic Architect of Health Care Reform Implementation
Here is the story of Steve Larsen's latest career move, per the Wall Street Journal,
A top official in charge of implementing the federal health-care overhaul said Friday he would step down in mid-July, shortly after the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the fate of the law.
The official, Steve Larsen, heads the office at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that oversees most of the insurance provisions in the 2010 law. Those include setting up exchanges for consumers to shop for plans and obtain subsidies for premiums, establishing rules on how much money insurers must spend on medical benefits, and administering a federal program to provide insurance for consumers with pre-existing conditions.
Mr. Larsen said in an interview that his departure was '100% for personal and family reasons,' and that he hadn't considered the timing of the court decision. He cited his need to pay tuition for his college-bound children,...
The Wall Street Journal coverage made it sound like Mr Larsen was fleeing his post to avoid dealing with how the Supreme Court's decision on the Obama administration's health care reform law might complicate future functions of his office,
Mr. Larsen's departure highlights the challenges the administration will face once the Supreme Court rules. If the court upholds the law, the administration has a 2014 deadline to put it in place, including persuading states to set up the exchanges or establishing them on states' behalf.
If the court strikes down the law's key requirement, that most individuals purchase insurance or pay a fine, federal officials will have to establish whether they can make the remaining insurance elements of the law work, which would face stiff opposition from insurance companies and from Republican lawmakers who have pledged to overturn the law.
If the court voids the law entirely, officials will have to start undoing hundreds of its requirements that are set up to take effect or are, in many cases, already in place.
It only briefly mentioned where Mr Larsen was going, ostensibly in hopes that a better salary would aid in his tuition payments,
[he] said he would be working at a health-services business unit of UnitedHealth Group, an insurer
On the other hand, a report from Bloomberg suggested that UnitedHealth thought he would be well worth his salary,
Larsen will be executive vice president at Optum, a health services and information technology company that is part of UnitedHealth Group Inc., of Minnetonka, Minn., the company confirmed. UnitedHealth Group is the parent company of UnitedHealthcare, the largest health insurer in the United States in terms of policyholders and revenues.It is funny how that experience seemed to be about crafting the regulations under which Optum, or at least its parent corporation would have to operate.
'We are excited to welcome Steve Larsen to Optum,' company spokesman Matthew Stearns told BNA in an email. 'Steve's extensive, broad-based experience in health care will further enhance the support Optum provides to the health system and consumers in a rapidly evolving environment.'
But wait, there is more. Bloomberg also mentioned that Mr Larsen had previously gone from a state government health policy position to the insurance industry before he wound up at the CCIIO.
Prior to joining the Obama administration to implement PPACA, Larsen served in a number of capacities at Amerigroup Corp., a public managed care company serving Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries, according to his biography on the CCIIO website. Larsen also was Maryland insurance commissioner for six years, chairman of the Maryland Public Service Commission for Gov. Martin O'Malley (D),...To clarify, Amerigroup is a publicly-held, Fortune 500 for-profit corporation (look here).
So in summary, and in chronological order, as best as I can establish it, Mr Larsen went from a Maryland state government policy position that affected health (and other insurance) companies, to a health insurance company (Amerigroup), to a US government policy position that affected health insurance, and now to another health insurance company (UnitedHealth).
The Peripatetic Legislative Policy Director
Brett Roper moved in the opposite direction, to government from industry, and to the Republican legislative majority, not the executive branch now controlled by the Democrats. Early in June, on the Republic Report,
In late 2010, as Congressman John Boehner (R-OH) prepared to take the gavel as Speaker, he hired a lobbyist named Brett Loper as his new policy chief. Loper left his job at the Advanced Medical Technology Association, a lobby group for medical device-makers, to join Boehner.
The Association did not seem to sad to see him go,
Republic Report reviewed ethics forms disclosed filed with the House clerk’s office, and noticed that Loper actually received a $100,147 bonus in 2011 for leaving his medical device lobbying group and becoming a public servant.
But wait, there is more. Loper also previously made more than one transition between government and industry. As Politico reported in 2010, before Loper worked for the Advanced Medical Technology Association,
Loper worked in senior positions for then House Majority Leader Tom DeLay and as the House Ways and Means Committee Republican staff director under then-ranking member Rep. Jim McCrery of Louisiana
But wait, there is still more. In 2011, the Atlantic reported,
In December, Boehner hired Brett Loper to be his policy director. At the time, articles focused on Loper's previous job as a lobbyist for the Advanced Medical Technology, where Loper vigorously resisted attempts to reduce the deficit by fighting cuts in fees to his clients proposed by the Obama administration.
That is part of the story.
But missing from the pieces about Loper have been his connection to the Abramoff scandal and knowledge of how to use government money to 'nfluence'legislators.
Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words. Here is a photo of Loper (far right), basking in the tropical sun of the Marianas Islands, with Michael Scanlon (center), Jack Abramoff's partner in crime.
What is Loper doing in the Marianas?
As a staff member for Tom Delay, Loper was part of a mission to deliver money from the "favor factory," otherwise known as the Appropriations Committee of Congress, to two legislators in the Marianas, Norm Palacios and Alejo Mendiola (between Scanlon and Loper, above). In exchange for money for their two pet projects, Palacios and Mendiola agreed to switch their votes and support Abramoff's key ally in the Marianas, Benigno Fitial, in his bid to become Speaker of the House there.
The gambit worked. Fitial won. Abramoff -- whose lobbying contract to the Marianas had been canceled -- was re-hired by the Marianas. In that capacity, Abramoff resumed lobbying for the continuation of abusive labor practices in the islands. (For more on this, see my film, 'Casino Jack and the United States of Money.') Abramoff also continued to make sure that the grateful garment factory owners flowed campaign cash to key mainland Republican legislators, including Tom Delay.
Note that according to the Washington Post web-page on the Abramoff scandal,
Former Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff was sentenced to five years and 10 months in prison on March 29, after pleading guilty to fraud, tax evasion and conspiracy to bribe public officials in a deal that requires him to cooperate in an investigation into his relationshps with members of Congress. Sources familiar with the federal probe have told The Post that half a dozen lawmakers are under scrutiny, along with Hill aides, former business associates and government officials.
The scandal prompted Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) and Rep. Robert Ney (R-Ohio) to give up their leadership posts,...
So Mr Larsen went from Republican senior legislative staff positions, during which time he associated with the now admittedly guilty Abramoff, to an industry trade association, and then back to a Republican senior legislative staff position.
Summary
So here are two recent good examples of a particular type of conflict of interest involving government and health care corporations. Both cases are of people who have made multiple transitions through the "revolving door" between the health care corporate world, and government agencies and organizations that are involved in policies that affect that world.
These transitions' multiplicity appears to represent a conflict of interest because these peoples' frequent revolutions through the door might diminish any sense that they ever have a primary interest on behalf of any immediate employer when another employer on the other side of the supposed arms' length government-industry relationship is always beckoning. Thus the people involved appear to have become members of a peculiar class always in transition, and hence more attuned to self-interest than to promoting the health of patients and the population (which ought to have been the primary concern for government leaders.) As Matt Kelley on the Compliance Week blog wrote in response to the Larsen story,
if you ever wonder why so many Americans feel like their country is slipping away from them, the revolving door—the sense that a private club of success exists in this country, and most Americans don't get to go through it, but merely live with the dictates of those who do—is a big reason why.As we wrote before health policy in the US, in particular, has become an insiders' game. Unless it is redirected to reflect patients' and the public's health, facilitated by the knowledge of unbiased clinical and policy experts rather than corporate public relations, expect our efforts at health care reform to just increase health care dysfunction.
Physicians, public health advocates, whatever unbiased health policy experts remain must educate the public about how health policy has been turned into a corporate sandbox. We must try to somehow activate the public to call for health care policy of the people, by the people, and for the people.
Fool Us Once, Shame on You, Fool Us Twice, Shame on Us - The Untrustworthy Pronouncements of Aetna's Former CEOs
Immediate Past-CEO of Aetna Ron Williams' Abrupt Change of Mind on the Individual Mandate
Williams wrote,
Soon the U.S. Supreme Court will rule on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. I am not a lawyer, or an expert on the Constitution. But as the chairman and CEO of a major health plan, I had a ringside seat to the entire health-care reform process. After much reflection, I have concluded that the federal individual mandate, which requires all Americans to purchase health insurance starting in 2014, will not be upheld.
On this, Williams was soon proven wrong. The Supreme Court upheld the law. However, the tempest was not due just to Williams' reversal of his former opinion, but the role he actually played in pushing his former opinion into the passage of the law, which was really far more than being a "ringside" spectator.
In an August 24, 2009 article, "Aetna's Ron Williams on Health Reform," Forbes' Dan Whelan noted,
Williams, 59, is taking a surprisingly visible role in arguing for change in the health care system. He has met with Obama a half-dozen times (he shrugs off the surname gaffe), has testified four times in front of Senate committees this year and participates in shindigs set up by the many trade groups for which he's a director.
Williams' position echoes that of the HMO industry generally: He's against a government-run plan but favors universal coverage and forcing insurers to take all comers.
As Wendell Potter, the former head of public relations for large health for-profit health insurance company Cigna, who is now a strong industry critic, put it on his blog,
Ron Williams who possibly more than anyone else had persuaded the President to reconsider his campaign pledge to enact reform without making people buy coverage from a private insurer. Candidate Obama’s reform platform differed from those of Hillary Clinton’s and John Edwards’ in only one significant way: both Clinton and Edwards embraced the mandate, which Williams was championing, first behind the scenes and then publicly, on behalf of the insurance industry. Candidate Obama said he didn’t believe it was right for people to be forced to buy something they couldn’t afford.
Williams was the industry’s most visible CEO on Capitol Hill during the debate on reform. He testified at numerous congressional hearings about how essential it was to move the millions of uninsured Americans into private health insurance plans and how an individual mandate was necessary to make that happen. He also never missed an opportunity to trash the idea of a 'public option' to compete with private insurance companies, which candidate Obama had said was essential 'to keep private insurers honest.'
Capitol Hill was not the only place Williams was frequenting during the reform debate. In an August 2009 article in Forbes, Williams was quoted as saying that he already had met with the President six times. When I called the White House to confirm that, a top aide told me it was true Williams had been there many times, adding, 'We’ve found him to be one of the more reasonable ones.'
Williams' recent seeming disavowal of the individual mandate raises the question of why anyone, much less President Obama, trusted him in the first place. After all, he was CEO of Aetna.
2001 Aetna CEO John Rowe Blamed Everyone Else for Health Care Problems
In fact, perusal of my memory, and a few file folders suggested several previous cases in which Aetna CEOs issued pronouncements that should not have been trusted.
First I recalled a meeting in 2001 at Brown during which the then Aetna CEO was honored by giving the Paul Levinger Lecture on "Good Health: Can We Afford It?" (See original Brown news release here.) My memory is that of Dr Rowe blaming just about everybody other than the for-profit health care insurance companies for health care's ills. A Brown Daily Herald article (not currently on line, Baskin B. Health care getting harder to afford, Aetna chief tells Brown U. Brown Daily Herald, November 30, 2001) recounted him blaming "cost inflation," (presumably due to doctors and hospitals), and employers, for whom "quality doesn't matter." He only allowed that insurers were to blame for not giving "better service," but not either rising costs or poor quality. I also recall Dr Rowe being treated with great respect by the audience. After all, this was a prestigious lecture.
However, his talk seemed just the least bit self-serving. If the audience had been aware of his record at the time, maybe we would have been more skeptical.
Mount Sinai CEO Dr John Rowe Extolled Merger with New York University, Jumped to Become Aetna CEO as Merger Began to Fail
By 1993, Dr Rowe was CEO of Mount Sinai Medical Center, and was seemingly at the vanguard of the movement for health care CEOs to be paid a lot. The New York Times reported that the 1993 Chronicle of Philanthropy survey showed him to be the country's best paid non-profit CEO, bringing in total compensation of over $800,000 in 1993 dollars. By 1998, Dr Rowe's big project was pushing concentration of power in health care in the form of a proposed merger between New York University Medical Center and Mount Sinai. According to the New York Times, the plan would be for Dr Rowe to become CEO of the combined entity. At the time, he said,
The advantages of merging hospitals are so great, they far outweigh any hypothetical potential negative impact.
The bond issue needed to finance the merger, however, ran into trouble by early 2000. Soon after that, Dr Rowe seemingly demonstrated his lack of faith in it by jumping to the leadership of Aetna. It turned out, according to the Hartford Courant, Aetna's offer was just to rich to turn down.
Rowe got a $2 million sign-on bonus to leave Mount Sinai NYU Health and become chief executive of Aetna's health business, the document says. He will also get a $1.4 million retention bonus on July 3, 2001.
Both bonuses are designed to replace money that Rowe forfeited by leaving the giant New York hospital system, Aetna spokeswoman Joyce Oberdorf said.
In addition, Rowe will get an annual salary of at least $1 million and an annual bonus of $1 million to $3 million, depending on how well goals are met, under a three-year employment agreement with two possible one-year extensions.
Rowe, who already received 25,000 shares of restricted Aetna stock and options on 500,000 shares, will get another 100,000 options. The new options will be granted when Aetna spins off its health business to shareholders, or on Jan. 1, 2001 -- whichever comes first. The exercise price will be about $72.73, or whatever price Aetna stock is trading at the time if it's higher than that.
By 2001, the New York Times referred to the merger as existing "in name only." That year, the campuses resumed separate administration. The merger was officially terminated in 2008. Its failure was documented in an Academic Medicine article. (Kastor JA. Failure of the merger of the Mount Sinai and New York University hospitals and medical schools: part 2. Acad Med 2010; 85: 1828-32. Link here.)
If the Brown audience had known that the merger Dr Rowe extolled with such confidence was already failing, but that he was able to leverage his role in its development to go from the country's best paid non-profit CEO to a multi-million dollar a year insurance CEO, maybe we would have felt less guilt about our responsibility for health care's high cost, low access and poor quality.
Aetna CEO Richard Huber's Failure to "Walk the Walk"
In fact, searching through the files showed an even earlier example of an Aetna CEO talking out of two sides of his mouth.
By 1998, an American Medical News article documented the "rocky relations" between Aetna and physicians. By early 2000, Aetna CEO Richard Huber was known as "the managed care executive physicians love to hate," per the American Medical News. His departure was characterized by then American Medical News Street Smarts columnist Dr Scott Gottlieb, as partly due to how
Huber talked out of one side of his mouth about his company's obsessive quest for 'quality' health care -- while out of the other he was screaming at doctors, hospitals and drug firms about controlling costs. Yet Aetna's medical costs were still creeping up. As Richard Huber learned, you can't talk the talk if you don't walk the walk.
Summary
So the unreliability of recent Aetna CEO Ron Williams' advocacy of the "patient mandate," was presaged by similarly untrustworthy pronouncement by two former Aetna CEOs. In each case, the remarks of the particular CEO seemed more designed to promote his immediate self-interest than to provide trustworthy opinion or policy advice.
By the way, this summary should not be viewed as particularly an indictment of Aetna. I am sure I could find equally untrustworthy but self-serving pronouncements from the leaders of many other health care organizations. (Recall the visionary pronouncements of the failed and ultimately jailed CEO of the now vanished Allegheny Health Education and Research Foundation, see post here.)
The recent Ron Williams reversal should serve, however, as a stark reminder that we, meaning physicians, other health care professionals, those who study health care and health policy, policy makers, and the public at large, should be very, very skeptical about any pronouncements about health policy by top executives of health care organizations. They as a group have shown themselves to be remarkably good at doing whatever it takes to buttress their immediate self-interest, including making apparently oracular but ultimately foolish policy pronouncements.
The real question is why these pronouncements continue to be treated with reverence, if not as "visionaries," by health care professionals, health care and policy researchers, the news media, health care and medical journals, policy makers, politicians, and the public at large? Why has hardly anyone, besides yours truly, gone back to check the accuracy of their previous pontifications before swooning over their latest ones? Why has hardly anyone examined the accuracy of their predecessors' opinions, given that most executives these days seem to be subject to the same incentives to make things look good in the short term, and never mind the consequences?